It has been announced that the heir of the original Norwegian developers of Anfi Resorts has sold his 50% share of Anfi del Mar to the hotel group Lopesan IFA which is also largely based in Gran Canaria. The impact for those clients whose case…
Canarian Legal Alliance is pleased to announce yet another High Court success against Anfi. High Court number 2 of Las Palmas following the precedent set by the Supreme Court have ruled our clients contract be null and void and the return of 52,744,96€ plus legal…
Canarian Legal Alliance would like to thank Family Kelly for their valuable words regarding our services, and especially for their trust placed in us in the past years. It was our pleasure to help them to fight for their rights as a consumer and to…
We are proud to share with you the latest payout for our clients who just got back over 33.000€ from ANFI as mandated by court order after obtaining a favourable sentence from the High Court number 3 of Las Palmas earlier this year.. Our clients are still due to receive the interests and the legal…
The Hammond Family are now happy ex timeshare owners but that does not mean they cannot enjoy holidays in the Gran Canaria Sunshine. Whilst enjoying their holiday they took some time out to call into the Canarian Legal Alliance office to thank in person the…
Canarian Legal Alliance is proud to share with you our latest court success against Anfi. High Court number 2 of Las Palmas declared our clients contract be null and void since it contained both the “in perpetuity” clause as well as floating weeks. The Supreme Court has declared…
The Supreme Court has ruled yet again in favour of our clients reaffirming their view of the illegal practices One of our English clients received the good news that their contract with Anfi has been declared null and void, and they will be getting…
More evidence emerged today of the way the Supreme Court rulings have affected decision making in the lower courts. The court of the 1st instance in Arona, Tenerife, has ruled in favour of our client, and against Silverpoint, on the basis that their contract was…